THE DAILY MORNING BREW
The World Is On Fire. Markets Are Mildly Inconvenienced
BRENT ~$96 ▲ | S&P 500 ~-3% MTD | 10Y UST ~4.4% ▲ | FED FUNDS 4.25-4.50% (hold) | VIX elevated
Good Morning from hit and humid Singapore
Just a random piece of history to kick start the day in case you find yourselves at a thursday night pub quiz…. Did you know in February 1816, the year following the eruption of Mount Tambora in Indonesia (the largest volcanic explosion in recorded human history). Europe woke up to discover that summer had been cancelled. Crops failed. Rivers froze in July. Horses starved in the streets of Geneva. The sky was the colour of a bruise. Tens of thousands died. Lord Byron wrote a poem called Darkness that begins, roughly, The bright sun was extinguish'd.
The response from European grain markets was a 50% price spike, a wave of food riots, and a complete restructuring of how governments thought about agricultural supply chains. The response from European equities was… a mild correction, followed by recovery.
That said, I am not saying the Iran war is Tambora. However, what I am saying that markets have always had a deeply peculiar relationship with catastrophe .. one that becomes explicable only once you understand that markets are not voting machines for how bad things are. They are discounting machines for corporate earnings three years from now, and corporate earnings three years from now are still, as of this writing, going up.
Oil is at $96. The Strait of Hormuz is closed. NATO declined to help. Jerome Powell is being investigated by the DOJ, apparently for the crime of having an independent opinion. And the S&P 500 is down three percent on the month. Three percent! Markets have had worse reactions to a disappointing iPhone launch.
We want to explore a bit as to why equities are calm while everything else isn't; what the bond market is actually pricing in right now; why crypto just got its long awaited legal clarity at the exact moment nobody cares about crypto anymore; what private equity is doing with its clothes on; and why a convicted fraudster is getting high fives from billionaires. Standard Thursday here at Caffeinated Capital
LAST WEEK IN REVIEW
Five Things That Happened While You Were Doing Other Things
1. The Fed held. Powell dug in.
The Federal Open Market Committee left rates unchanged at 4.25-4.50%, which was expected. The unexpected part was Jerome Powell announcing, at the press conference, that he has no plans to leave the Fed until a DOJ investigation into him concludes. The DOJ investigation, which was apparently supposed to pressure him into resigning, may have just extended his tenure. The White House has discovered that poking a central banker with a stick sometimes makes the central banker more central.
The dot plot still projects one cut in 2026, one in 2027. Several FOMC members skewed their 2026 dot to the upside. Translation: the Fed is watching oil prices, watching inflation expectations that have now been above target for five years, and is not in a hurry to do anything heroic. Jerome Powell said, essentially, that one off shocks keep stacking pandemic, Ukraine, tariffs, Iran and at some point transitory stops being a useful word.
1 The Fed's statement changed by exactly 45 words from January to March. Four of those words were the date. The rest were about Iran. This is either reassuring discipline or the policy equivalent of rearranging deck chairs. Markets remain undecided.
2. The Iran war entered week three. Oil is at $96. Markets are... fine?
The US and Israel struck Iran on February 28th. The Strait of Hormuz remains closed. Iran's security chief was killed. Trump asked NATO for military support and NATO said, in the diplomatic equivalent of a shrug, no. The Reserve Bank of Australia hiked rates in response to inflation concerns, becoming the first major central bank to blink.
And yet: the S&P 500 is down roughly 3% since the outbreak. Fund managers surveyed by Bank of America are underweight equities but nowhere near the panic of Liberation Day or 2022. The VIX has risen, but less than during the August 2024 carry trade unwind. Commodities are outperforming stocks and bonds, as you would expect when someone closes the world's most important oil chokepoint. Consensus expectation: Brent crude around $80 by year-end. That is, apparently, manageable.
The reason equities are holding up, in a word, is earnings. Corporate earnings forecasts (even ex-energy) have not yet moved. Analysts are waiting for more clarity before they downgrade. Which means the market is, at this exact moment, priced on the assumption that the war ends soon and the disruption is temporary. Whether that's reasonable or a polite form of denial is the question of the month.
2 The one exception to market calm: catastrophe bonds. Cat bonds instruments that pay investors unless a natural disaster (hurricane, earthquake) triggers losses have actually gone UP since the war started, while everything else has wobbled. This is not because war is good. It's because cat bonds only care about weather. The Strait of Hormuz is not a hurricane. More on this in the Deep Dive.
3. The SEC declared: most crypto is not securities.
After years of legal ambiguity, aggressive enforcement, and fierce lobbying, the SEC released a formal interpretation: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Dogecoin, and most tokens you have heard of are 'digital commodities,' not securities. Payment stablecoins are not securities. NFTs are 'digital collectibles,' not securities. Staking rewards are not securities.
The logic is elegant and slightly strange: yes, the original token offering might have been a securities transaction. But the token itself is not a security. Once the issuer builds the protocol or clearly gives up trying the token is just a token, trading freely among people who have various reasons for wanting it. The SEC can regulate the fundraising stage. It cannot, apparently, regulate the asset itself forever.
More on what this means and doesn't mean in the Deep Dive.
4. Powell's DOJ problem may have backfired spectacularly.
The DOJ opened an investigation into Jerome Powell. The apparent theory was that this would create enough pressure for Powell to step aside early, allowing the White House to install a more accommodating Fed chair sooner. Instead, Powell announced publicly that he is staying on the FOMC until the investigation concludes. And beyond that, he hasn't decided whether to stay as a governor after his chairmanship ends. The investigation may have accidentally anchored one of the more hawkish voices in the room for longer than anyone expected.
3 There is a version of this that ends with a White House staffer staring at the ceiling at 2am realising they have trapped a hawkish central banker in his own chair. That version is probably the accurate one.
5. UBS rang some very large cowbells. (Ala Will Ferrel SNL)
UBS completed the migration of 1.2 million Credit Suisse clients onto its systems after a 10 month operation involving more than 80,000 tests and 132,000 hours of staff training. To celebrate, executives rang four Swiss cowbells, each requiring two people to carry. This is what success looks like in financial infrastructure: no money was lost, no accounts disappeared, and you get to ring a cowbell the size of a labrador. The front office gets bonuses. Operations gets cowbells. Both groups believe they got the better deal.
LET'S DEEP DIVE
The Token That Grew Up: What The SEC's Crypto Ruling Actually Says
Consider, for a moment, the tulip.
In 1636 Amsterdam, a single Semper Augustus bulb traded for the price of a house on the canal. This was not because the tulip was a house. It was because the tulip was a story a story about Dutch horticultural prestige, about conspicuous wealth, about the social performance of having the most coveted thing in the most coveted city in Europe. The tulip's value was almost entirely relational. It meant something because everyone agreed it meant something.
Now… the bulb, once planted, grows. It produces a flower. The flower is observed to be a flower. At this point, something interesting happens in the story. The question of whether the bulb was worth it becomes philosophically complicated, because the bulb has done the thing it was always supposed to do. It has delivered on its promise. The contract between buyer and seller, in some deep sense, is complete.
The US Securities and Exchange Commission, this week, extended this logic to cryptocurrency and the result is more coherent than it sounds.
The Core Argument
Here is the SEC's new position, stripped of legalese: when a crypto project raises money from investors with promises that 'we are going to build this amazing protocol and if we do, your tokens will be worth a lot,' that is a securities offering. Those tokens, at that moment, are part of an investment contract. The fundraise is regulated. Disclosure rules apply.
But then the project builds the thing. Or fails visibly enough that everyone can see it's not building the thing. Either way, the investment contract the specific promise that justified securities regulation has concluded. The token, now trading among thousands of people for various reasons having nothing to do with the original team's managerial efforts, is no longer a security. It is a digital commodity. Like gold. Like wheat. Like a tulip, if you will, after it has bloomed.
The token can stop being a security in two ways: the issuer finishes what it promised to build, or it clearly gives up trying. In success or failure, securities law only applies for a little while.
This is actually a fairly elegant reading of securities doctrine. The Howey test the legal standard for what counts as an 'investment contract' has always focused on whether investors are depending on the managerial efforts of someone else. Once the protocol is built, decentralized, and running without its founders calling the shots, that condition arguably stops being true.
What This Means For You
If you own Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, or most major tokens: your assets are now clearly digital commodities, regulated like oil futures, not like shares. Crypto exchanges don't need to register as national securities exchanges. The legal cloud that has been hanging over the industry for a decade has lifted.
The more interesting question, which the ruling barely touches, is whether this matters for prices. Because here is the awkward timing: the industry spent years fighting for this legal clarity. It funded campaigns, lobbied aggressively, waited for a friendly administration. And it won. The ruling is everything they asked for.
And yet. The great crypto bull market ran on ambiguity. Part of the appeal was the transgression operating in a legal grey zone, being part of something the establishment didn't understand and couldn't control. Now it's understood. It's been classified, taxonomized, given its own regulatory category. Bitcoin is a commodity. Like corn.
The period when you could raise $200 million for a new blockchain protocol by writing a whitepaper and giving a speech about how it would replace all the banks that era ran from roughly 2017 to 2022. The era ended not because regulators stopped it but because the market stopped believing in it. The legal clarity arrived late and found the party had already moved to prediction markets and AI infrastructure.
In 2021, tokens were illegal but exciting. In 2026, they are legal but sort of boring. The SEC fixed the legal status at the exact moment the cultural status expired. This is not the SEC's finest hour in terms of timing.
4 The one area where the ruling creates genuinely new opportunity: staking. Previously the SEC argued that locking up tokens to earn yield was a securities offering. Now it isn't. This matters most for institutional holders of proof-of-stake assets who wanted to earn yield on their holdings but couldn't without regulatory risk. That group can now proceed. It is not a bull market trigger. It is a legal annoyance that has been removed.
The Fraud Question
There is a genuinely weird implication buried in the ruling that nobody is talking about. If you are the founder and chief promoter of a crypto protocol, and you go around making extraordinary claims about it, and you are lying at some point your lies transition from 'securities fraud' (very much the SEC's problem) to 'things someone said about a digital commodity' (not the SEC's problem, and possibly not anyone's problem).
Where is that line? The ruling doesn't say. It says it depends on when the 'essential managerial efforts' have concluded. But 'essential managerial efforts' is itself a term that will be litigated for the next decade. The SEC did not so much resolve the legal question as it moved the legal question one abstraction layer higher.
This is, with slightly better software and considerably worse explanations, how regulatory frameworks usually work.
INVESTMENT MANAGER TIME
The Iran Playbook: What the Bond Market Is Actually Pricing
Let's talk about what's really happening in fixed income, because the equity market is getting all the attention and the bond market is doing something more interesting.
The 10-year US Treasury yield has risen about 28 basis points in March. A simple model based on the Fed's usual reaction function current inflation, unemployment, the short-rate path would only explain about 15-16 of those basis points. The remaining 12-13 basis points are unexplained by fundamentals. That's the war premium.
You can try to disaggregate this into two components: inflation fear (oil prices will push CPI higher, the Fed may need to stay restrictive longer) and fiscal fear (we're fighting a war, deficits will expand, bond supply is coming). The 1-year inflation swap has risen 70 basis points this month, suggesting real concern about near-term price pressure. The 10-year swap spread has fallen 5 basis points, hinting at fiscal risk premium as well. If you had to split the unexplained 13 basis points evenly, neither story would feel stretched.
What this means for a multi-asset investor is straightforward, if uncomfortable. Bonds have already priced more war than equities have. The equity market is still running on pre-war earnings estimates. One of these is more right than the other, and historically when there's a gap between what bonds and stocks are discounting, bonds tend to be asking the better questions.
The Catastrophe Bond Case Study
Here's something genuinely worth knowing: catastrophe bonds instruments that transfer natural disaster risk from insurance companies to capital markets have outperformed everything this month. The Swiss Re cat bond index is up slightly while the S&P is down 3%, Treasuries are down, and high-yield credit has widened.
This is not magic. Cat bonds pay a spread over Treasury rates. When Treasury yields rise (as they have), cat bonds pay more. And cat bonds have zero exposure to geopolitical risk they only lose money if a hurricane or earthquake triggers their loss conditions. The Strait of Hormuz is not in their risk model.
The lesson is not 'everyone should buy cat bonds.' The lesson is structural: in a world where the traditional stock-bond correlation has broken down where bonds and equities can fall together, as they did in 2022, as they are doing now there is genuine value in assets whose risk profile is genuinely orthogonal to geopolitical stress. Cat bonds happen to be one of them. The trade-off is complexity, illiquidity, and a tail risk that is literally hurricane-shaped.
A portfolio that loses money if Miami floods is, in a real sense, a diversifier against a portfolio that loses money if someone closes a shipping lane. Whether you want both exposures is a different question from whether the logic holds.
Consumer Watch: The Number That Matters
Diesel is above $5 a gallon in the US. That number matters more than Brent crude at $96 for two reasons: first, diesel is the fuel of the actual economy trucking, agriculture, construction. When diesel rises 35%, the cost increase flows directly and quickly into the price of everything that moves. Second, unlike 2022, consumers don't have pandemic savings to absorb it. The savings rate was already at multi-decade lows before the war started. A sustained energy shock hits an economy that has very little cushion.
The savings rate could fall to 3.9% if current gasoline prices hold, according to estimates from SMBC Nikko. That is the savings rate of a country running on fumes. If unemployment starts rising while savings are this thin, the recession math becomes unhappy very quickly.
Watch: consumer sentiment (already at a 3-month low), the next round of earnings revisions, and whether the Fed flinches.
5 The Bank of Canada, for what it's worth, held rates this week despite facing a very similar inflation-vs-growth dilemma. Canada is a net oil exporter, which means the price shock is simultaneously bad news (higher prices, rate pressure) and good news (revenues, currency support). The Canadian economy is doing the financial equivalent of having food poisoning at a restaurant you also own.
OUTRO
On Scammers, Pardons, and the Useful Resume Item of Federal Conviction
Trevor Milton was convicted in 2022 of defrauding investors in his electric truck company with repeated lies about the technology. He faced four years in prison and was ordered to pay back $676 million. In March 2025, a phone call from the White House erased all of that. He has since joined what he describes, without apparent irony, as 'an exclusive group of post-pardon businesspeople.' He walks into meetings and receives high-fives from billionaires. They tell him: 'We can trust you now.'
They can trust him now because a jury convicted him of fraud.
This column has, over time, gently argued that there is a logic increasingly, alarmingly by which losing large sums of other people's money is not disqualifying and may, in certain markets, actually enhance your professional reputation. Risk tolerance is what you're selling. Failure is evidence you have it. The hedge funds and venture funds that hire you want to know you will swing big.
But there has always been a distinction between 'lost a billion dollars honestly' and 'stole money and lied about it to get investors.' The former suggests boldness. The latter suggests something else. Or it used to.
In 2026, a federal fraud conviction properly pardoned, properly framed appears to function as a credential. It says: I survived the worst the system could throw at me. The system tried to stop me and it didn't. You can trust that I won't be stopped.
The phrase 'legal realism' gets used in law schools to describe the theory that what matters is not the rule but what the judge will actually do. We are watching, in real time, its extension to capital markets. What matters is not the verdict. What matters is whether anyone with enforcement authority still cares.
This brings us back, inevitably, to where we started. The cold open noted that markets are down about three percent on the month despite a war, a closed shipping lane, a central bank standoff, and oil approaching $100. Three percent. Less than a bad earnings surprise.
The market is not saying the world is fine. It's saying: the earnings are still there. The trust is still there. The system is still functional, more or less, in ways that compound over three-year horizons. It is pricing, with unsettling calm, the hypothesis that things will mostly work out that the war will end, that oil will retreat, that the Fed will eventually cut, that the economy has enough slack in the right places.
Maybe it's right. Markets have been wrong in both directions before, badly, and the record of 'things looked manageable until they suddenly weren't' is long.
But consider this… if you've spent the last three weeks looking at the headlines and feeling like the world is falling apart faster than markets are acknowledging you are not wrong. You are just watching a different price. The market is pricing earnings in 2028. The headlines are pricing what's happening on Thursday.
One of these will be right. We're going to find out which one over the next few months.
See you tomorrow.
THE DAILY MORNING BREW Is Not investment advice. Not financial advice. Not advice.
Forward this to someone who needs to know what's actually happening.